↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

In‐work tax credits for families and their impact on health status in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
455 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
In‐work tax credits for families and their impact on health status in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009963.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frank Pega, Kristie Carter, Tony Blakely, Patricia J Lucas

Abstract

By improving two social determinants of health (poverty and unemployment) in low- and middle-income families on or at risk of welfare, in-work tax credit for families (IWTC) interventions could impact health status and outcomes in adults.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 455 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 450 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 74 16%
Researcher 55 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 10%
Student > Bachelor 45 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 5%
Other 77 17%
Unknown 134 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 108 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 51 11%
Social Sciences 47 10%
Psychology 40 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12 3%
Other 46 10%
Unknown 151 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2017.
All research outputs
#15,053,608
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,839
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,394
of 209,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#201
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.