↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Hydralazine for essential hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Hydralazine for essential hypertension
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004934.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael R Kandler, Greg T Mah, Aaron M Tejani, Sarah N Stabler, Douglas M Salzwedel

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 17%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 18 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 7%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Chemistry 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 20 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2019.
All research outputs
#5,466,319
of 18,457,061 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,786
of 11,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,820
of 269,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#176
of 236 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,457,061 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,836 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 236 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.