↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Early amniotomy and early oxytocin for prevention of, or therapy for, delay in first stage spontaneous labour compared with routine care

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
196 Mendeley
Title
Early amniotomy and early oxytocin for prevention of, or therapy for, delay in first stage spontaneous labour compared with routine care
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006794.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shuqin Wei, Bi Lan Wo, Hui-Ping Qi, Hairong Xu, Zhong-Cheng Luo, Chantal Roy, William D Fraser

Abstract

Caesarean section rates are over 20% in many developed countries. The main diagnosis contributing to the high rate in nulliparae is dystocia or prolonged labour. The present review assesses the effects of a policy of early amniotomy with early oxytocin administration for the prevention of, or the therapy for, delay in labour progress.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 195 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 19%
Student > Master 33 17%
Researcher 27 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 7%
Other 11 6%
Other 33 17%
Unknown 40 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 17%
Psychology 8 4%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 50 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2020.
All research outputs
#10,871,789
of 19,240,244 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,489
of 11,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,156
of 171,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#86
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,240,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.