| Title |
Influenza vaccination in children being treated with chemotherapy for cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006484.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ginette M Goossen, Leontien CM Kremer, Marianne D van de Wetering |
| Abstract |
Influenza infection is a potential cause of severe morbidity in children with cancer; therefore vaccination against influenza is recommended. However, data are conflicting regarding the immune response to influenza vaccination in children with cancer, and the value of vaccination remains unclear. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 33% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| India | 1 | 7% |
| Andorra | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 20% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Estonia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 215 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 37 | 17% |
| Researcher | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 11% |
| Other | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 42 | 19% |
| Unknown | 60 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 9% |
| Psychology | 13 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 29 | 13% |
| Unknown | 69 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,199,544
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,575
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,403
of 210,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#107
of 265 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 265 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.