↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Laquinimod for multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
Title
Laquinimod for multiple sclerosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010475.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dian He, Kai Han, Xiangdong Gao, Shuai Dong, Lan Chu, ZhanHui Feng, Shan Wu

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic immune-mediated, inflammatory, demyelinating, neurodegenerative disorder of the central nervous system, and it causes major socioeconomic burden for the individual patient and for society. An inflammatory pathology occurs during the early relapsing stage of MS and a neurodegenerative pathology dominates the later progressive stage of the disease. Not all MS patients respond adequately to currently available disease-modifying drugs (DMDs). Alternative MS treatments with new modes of action are required to expand the current options for disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) and to aim for freedom from relapses, inflammatory lesions, disability progression and neurodegeneration. Laquinimod has dual properties of immunomodulation and neuroprotection and is a potentially promising new oral DMD in the treatment of relapsing MS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 134 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Researcher 13 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Other 7 5%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 46 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Psychology 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 53 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,270,657
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,683
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,879
of 209,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#104
of 252 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 252 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.