↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgical fixation methods for tibial plateau fractures

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Surgical fixation methods for tibial plateau fractures
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2024
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009679.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Toby O Smith, Laura Casey, Iain R McNamara, Caroline B Hing

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Postgraduate 4 17%
Librarian 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 6 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 17%
Unspecified 1 4%
Unknown 6 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2024.
All research outputs
#21,765,870
of 26,726,803 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12,368
of 13,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,361
of 258,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#52
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,726,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,270 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.