| Title |
Antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) related complications in surgical patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010268.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Rahul Koti, Peter Wilson, Brian R Davidson |
| Abstract |
Risk of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection after surgery is generally low, but affects up to 33% of patients after certain types of surgery. Postoperative MRSA infection can occur as surgical site infections (SSIs), chest infections, or bloodstream infections (bacteraemia). The incidence of MRSA SSIs varies from 1% to 33% depending upon the type of surgery performed and the carrier status of the individuals concerned. The optimal prophylactic antibiotic regimen for the prevention of MRSA after surgery is not known. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 308 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 301 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 50 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 10% |
| Researcher | 28 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 27 | 9% |
| Other | 23 | 7% |
| Other | 63 | 20% |
| Unknown | 86 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 127 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Psychology | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 28 | 9% |
| Unknown | 100 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,877,315
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,016
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,914
of 209,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#92
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.