↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

T‐tube drainage versus primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
Title
T‐tube drainage versus primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005641.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Rahul Koti, Brian R Davidson

Abstract

T-tube drainage may prevent bile leak from the biliary tract following bile duct exploration and it offers post-operative access to the bile ducts for visualisation and exploration. Use of T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct (CBD) exploration is controversial.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 129 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 14%
Other 17 13%
Researcher 12 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 40 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 44 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2013.
All research outputs
#17,348,916
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,493
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,069
of 209,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#239
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.