| Title |
Smoking cessation interventions for smokers with current or past depression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006102.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Regina M van der Meer, Marc C Willemsen, Filip Smit, Pim Cuijpers |
| Abstract |
Individuals with current or past depression are often smokers who are more nicotine dependent, more likely to suffer from negative mood changes after nicotine withdrawal, and more likely to relapse to smoking after quitting than the general population, which contributes to their higher morbidity and mortality from smoking-related illnesses. It remains unclear what interventions can help them to quit smoking. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 26% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 58% |
| Scientists | 4 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 343 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 339 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 57 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 44 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 64 | 19% |
| Unknown | 74 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 94 | 27% |
| Psychology | 72 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 35 | 10% |
| Unknown | 91 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,154,181
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,643
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,848
of 198,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#53
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.