The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Heparin for assisted reproduction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009452.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Muhammad A Akhtar, Shyamaly D Sur, Nick Raine‐Fenning, Kannamannadiar Jayaprakasan, Jim G Thornton, Siobhan Quenby |
| Abstract |
Heparin as an adjunct in assisted reproduction (peri-implantation heparin) is given at or after egg collection or at embryo transfer during assisted reproduction. Heparin has been advocated to improve embryo implantation and clinical outcomes. It has been proposed that heparin enhances the intra-uterine environment by improving decidualisation with an associated activation of growth factors and a cytokine expression profile in the endometrium that is favourable to pregnancy. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 193 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 31 | 16% |
| Researcher | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 14% |
| Unknown | 70 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 66 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 10% |
| Unknown | 80 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,377,389
of 26,311,549 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,707
of 13,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,697
of 211,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#154
of 230 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,311,549 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 230 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.