| Title |
Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F (a traditional Chinese medicine) for primary nephrotic syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008568.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yizhi Chen, Zhixiang Gong, Xiangmei Chen, Li Tang, Xuezhi Zhao, Qing Yuan, Guangyan Cai |
| Abstract |
Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F (TwHF), a traditional Chinese herbal medicine used as an immunosuppressive agent, has been prescribed in China for patients with primary nephrotic syndrome (NS) for more than two decades. Although patients with primary NS in China have benefited from TwHF treatment, its properties have not yet been fully understood. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 115 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 13% |
| Researcher | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 22 | 19% |
| Unknown | 29 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 8% |
| Psychology | 6 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 33 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2013.
All research outputs
#19,198,751
of 23,791,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,868
of 12,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,111
of 199,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#224
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,791,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,758 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.