↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F (a traditional Chinese medicine) for primary nephrotic syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
<i>Tripterygium wilfordii</i> Hook F (a traditional Chinese medicine) for primary nephrotic syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008568.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yizhi Chen, Zhixiang Gong, Xiangmei Chen, Li Tang, Xuezhi Zhao, Qing Yuan, Guangyan Cai

Abstract

Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F (TwHF), a traditional Chinese herbal medicine used as an immunosuppressive agent, has been prescribed in China for patients with primary nephrotic syndrome (NS) for more than two decades. Although patients with primary NS in China have benefited from TwHF treatment, its properties have not yet been fully understood.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 120 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 14%
Student > Master 16 13%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 31 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Psychology 6 5%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 36 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2013.
All research outputs
#20,726,842
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,373
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,317
of 209,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#224
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.