↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for infantile esotropia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for infantile esotropia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004917.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sue Elliott, Ayad Shafiq

Abstract

Infantile esotropia (IE) is the inward deviation of the eye. Various aspects of the clinical management of IE are unclear; mainly, the most effective type of intervention and the age at intervention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 115 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 14%
Student > Master 15 13%
Researcher 12 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 35 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Psychology 5 4%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 39 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2013.
All research outputs
#16,640,730
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,358
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,654
of 210,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#217
of 256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.