↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for infantile esotropia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for infantile esotropia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004917.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sue Elliott, Ayad Shafiq

Abstract

Infantile esotropia (IE) is the inward deviation of the eye. Various aspects of the clinical management of IE are unclear; mainly, the most effective type of intervention and the age at intervention.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 113 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 15%
Student > Master 16 14%
Researcher 12 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 33 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Psychology 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 37 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2013.
All research outputs
#14,873,226
of 23,075,872 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,627
of 12,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,302
of 199,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#209
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,075,872 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,362 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.2. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.