| Title |
Herbal medicines for fatty liver diseases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009059.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhao Lan Liu, Liang Zhen Xie, Jiang Zhu, George Q Li, Suzanne J Grant, Jian Ping Liu |
| Abstract |
Fatty liver disease is potentially a reversible condition that may lead to end-stage liver disease. Since herbal medicines such as Crataegus pinnatifida and Salvia miltiorrhiza have increasingly been used in the management of fatty liver disease, a systematic review on herbal medicine for fatty liver disease is needed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
| Australia | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 337 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 334 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 49 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 42 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 12% |
| Researcher | 35 | 10% |
| Other | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 52 | 15% |
| Unknown | 101 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 113 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 4% |
| Psychology | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 34 | 10% |
| Unknown | 122 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2020.
All research outputs
#4,583,188
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,966
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,592
of 199,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#132
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.