↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Electrotherapy for neck pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
553 Mendeley
Title
Electrotherapy for neck pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004251.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Kroeling, Anita Gross, Nadine Graham, Stephen J Burnie, Grace Szeto, Charles H Goldsmith, Ted Haines, Mario Forget

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 553 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 541 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 99 18%
Student > Bachelor 69 12%
Researcher 51 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 41 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 7%
Other 117 21%
Unknown 136 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 179 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 87 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 3%
Sports and Recreations 18 3%
Psychology 15 3%
Other 69 12%
Unknown 167 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,589,248
of 26,150,873 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,083
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,341
of 213,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#109
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,150,873 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.