↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Electrotherapy for neck pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
7 tweeters
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
538 Mendeley
Title
Electrotherapy for neck pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004251.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Kroeling, Anita Gross, Nadine Graham, Stephen J Burnie, Grace Szeto, Charles H Goldsmith, Ted Haines, Mario Forget

Abstract

Neck pain is common, disabling and costly. The effectiveness of electrotherapy as a physiotherapeutic option remains unclear. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2005 and previously updated in 2009.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 538 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 526 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 96 18%
Student > Bachelor 70 13%
Researcher 50 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 41 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 7%
Other 133 25%
Unknown 111 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 174 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 87 16%
Unspecified 23 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 3%
Sports and Recreations 18 3%
Other 77 14%
Unknown 141 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,254,202
of 23,746,606 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,864
of 12,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,047
of 201,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#111
of 232 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,746,606 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,754 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 232 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.