Title |
Electrotherapy for neck pain
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004251.pub5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Peter Kroeling, Anita Gross, Nadine Graham, Stephen J Burnie, Grace Szeto, Charles H Goldsmith, Ted Haines, Mario Forget |
Abstract |
Neck pain is common, disabling and costly. The effectiveness of electrotherapy as a physiotherapeutic option remains unclear. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2005 and previously updated in 2009. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | 29% |
Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
Sweden | 1 | 14% |
Spain | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 542 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 2 | <1% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Other | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 530 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 97 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 69 | 13% |
Researcher | 51 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 41 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 7% |
Other | 113 | 21% |
Unknown | 133 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 179 | 33% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 87 | 16% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 3% |
Sports and Recreations | 18 | 3% |
Psychology | 14 | 3% |
Other | 64 | 12% |
Unknown | 162 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,496,313
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,039
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,033
of 211,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#114
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.