↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Gonadotrophins for idiopathic male factor subfertility

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
Gonadotrophins for idiopathic male factor subfertility
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005071.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abdelhamid M Attia, Ahmed M Abou-Setta, Hesham G Al-Inany

Abstract

Male factors leading to subfertility account for at least half of all cases of subfertility worldwide. Although some causes of male subfertility are treatable, treatment of idiopathic male factor subfertility remains empirical. Researchers have used gonadotrophins to improve sperm parameters in idiopathic male factor subfertility with the ultimate goal of increasing birth and pregnancy rates, but results have been conflicting.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 134 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 13%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Other 7 5%
Other 30 22%
Unknown 30 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 10%
Psychology 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Unspecified 4 3%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 39 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,121,622
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,736
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,085
of 199,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#162
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.