↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Psychological interventions for women with metastatic breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
389 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Psychological interventions for women with metastatic breast cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004253.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohammed Mustafa, Andrew Carson-Stevens, David Gillespie, Adrian GK Edwards

Abstract

Psychological symptoms are associated with metastatic breast cancer. This is the basis for exploring the impact of psychological interventions on psychosocial and survival outcomes. One early study appeared to show significant survival and psychological benefits from psychological support while subsequent studies have revealed conflicting results. This review is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2004 and previously updated in 2007.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 389 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 385 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 76 20%
Student > Bachelor 51 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 12%
Researcher 37 10%
Student > Postgraduate 27 7%
Other 64 16%
Unknown 87 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 103 26%
Psychology 98 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 41 11%
Social Sciences 17 4%
Neuroscience 6 2%
Other 34 9%
Unknown 90 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2021.
All research outputs
#5,549,150
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,428
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,658
of 197,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#175
of 287 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 287 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.