↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
131 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
412 Mendeley
Title
Nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010712
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlo Ammendolia, Kent J Stuber, Elisabeth Rok, Raja Rampersaud, Carol A Kennedy, Victoria Pennick, Ivan A Steenstra, Linda K de Bruin, Andrea D Furlan

Abstract

Lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication is one of the most commonly diagnosed and treated pathological spinal conditions. It frequently afflicts the elderly population.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 412 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 407 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 80 19%
Student > Bachelor 44 11%
Other 37 9%
Researcher 36 9%
Student > Postgraduate 32 8%
Other 94 23%
Unknown 89 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 168 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 62 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 3%
Sports and Recreations 11 3%
Psychology 10 2%
Other 42 10%
Unknown 105 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,333,472
of 19,281,482 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,286
of 11,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,101
of 173,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#33
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,281,482 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.