| Title |
Treadmill interventions with partial body weight support in children under six years of age at risk of neuromotor delay
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009242.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Valentin-Gudiol M, Mattern-Baxter K, Girabent-Farrés M, Bagur-Calafat C, Hadders-Algra M, Angulo-Barroso RM, Valentin-Gudiol, Marta, Mattern-Baxter, Katrin, Girabent-Farrés, Montserrat, Bagur-Calafat, Caritat, Hadders-Algra, Mijna, Angulo-Barroso, Rosa Maria |
| Abstract |
Delayed motor development may occur in children with Down syndrome, cerebral palsy or children born preterm, which in turn may limit the child's opportunities to explore the environment. Neurophysiologic and early intervention literature suggests that task-specific training facilitates motor development. Treadmill intervention is a good example of locomotor task-specific training. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 393 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 381 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 75 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 13% |
| Researcher | 39 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 34 | 9% |
| Other | 69 | 18% |
| Unknown | 88 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 100 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 70 | 18% |
| Psychology | 23 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 20 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 20 | 5% |
| Other | 54 | 14% |
| Unknown | 106 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2016.
All research outputs
#14,759,250
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,620
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,953
of 240,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#159
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.