↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Treadmill interventions with partial body weight support in children under six years of age at risk of neuromotor delay

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
348 Mendeley
Title
Treadmill interventions with partial body weight support in children under six years of age at risk of neuromotor delay
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009242.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valentin-Gudiol M, Mattern-Baxter K, Girabent-Farrés M, Bagur-Calafat C, Hadders-Algra M, Angulo-Barroso RM, Valentin-Gudiol, Marta, Mattern-Baxter, Katrin, Girabent-Farrés, Montserrat, Bagur-Calafat, Caritat, Hadders-Algra, Mijna, Angulo-Barroso, Rosa Maria

Abstract

Delayed motor development may occur in children with Down syndrome, cerebral palsy or children born preterm, which in turn may limit the child's opportunities to explore the environment. Neurophysiologic and early intervention literature suggests that task-specific training facilitates motor development. Treadmill intervention is a good example of locomotor task-specific training.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 348 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 336 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 79 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 14%
Student > Bachelor 34 10%
Researcher 33 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 33 9%
Other 68 20%
Unknown 51 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 102 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 69 20%
Psychology 23 7%
Neuroscience 19 5%
Sports and Recreations 16 5%
Other 48 14%
Unknown 71 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2016.
All research outputs
#7,749,104
of 12,850,494 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,573
of 10,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,389
of 157,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#103
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,850,494 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,446 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.