↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Anticonvulsants for neonates with seizures

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
Title
Anticonvulsants for neonates with seizures
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004218.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Booth, David J Evans

Abstract

Neonatal seizures are a common problem and most neonates with seizures are treated with anticonvulsants. There is wide variation in clinical practice in both diagnosis and treatment of such seizures and this reflects the lack of clear evidence of the relative benefit and harm of the anticonvulsants used. The routine use of anticonvulsants to treat seizures in neonates needs to be evaluated.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 177 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 16%
Student > Master 24 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 12%
Student > Postgraduate 17 9%
Researcher 15 8%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 48 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 39%
Neuroscience 13 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Psychology 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 55 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,876,164
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,548
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,296
of 59,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.