↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Anticonvulsants for neonates with seizures

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
Title
Anticonvulsants for neonates with seizures
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004218.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Booth, David J Evans

Abstract

Neonatal seizures are a common problem and most neonates with seizures are treated with anticonvulsants. There is wide variation in clinical practice in both diagnosis and treatment of such seizures and this reflects the lack of clear evidence of the relative benefit and harm of the anticonvulsants used. The routine use of anticonvulsants to treat seizures in neonates needs to be evaluated.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 143 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 18%
Student > Master 24 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Student > Postgraduate 17 12%
Researcher 14 10%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 24 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 46%
Neuroscience 12 8%
Psychology 9 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 32 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2013.
All research outputs
#1,100,268
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,133
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,859
of 155,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.