| Title |
Antibiotics for treating chronic osteomyelitis in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004439.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lucieni O Conterno, Marilia D Turchi |
| Abstract |
Chronic osteomyelitis is generally treated with antibiotics and surgical debridement but can persist intermittently for years with frequent therapeutic failure or relapse. Despite advances in both antibiotic and surgical treatment, the long-term recurrence rate remains around 20%. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2009. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 303 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Panama | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 300 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 38 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 11% |
| Researcher | 31 | 10% |
| Other | 29 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 61 | 20% |
| Unknown | 88 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 131 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 28 | 9% |
| Unknown | 106 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,435,303
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,017
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,202
of 210,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#59
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.