↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for adults with multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
226 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
376 Mendeley
Title
Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for adults with multiple sclerosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006036.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fary Khan, Lynne Turner-Stokes, Louisa Ng, Trevor Kilpatrick, Bhasker Amatya

Abstract

Multidisciplinary rehabilitation (MD) is an important component of symptomatic and supportive treatment for Multiple sclerosis (MS), but evidence base for its effectiveness is yet to be established.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 376 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 5 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 367 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 75 20%
Student > Bachelor 60 16%
Researcher 45 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 10%
Student > Postgraduate 24 6%
Other 66 18%
Unknown 67 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 100 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 62 16%
Psychology 31 8%
Social Sciences 23 6%
Neuroscience 19 5%
Other 57 15%
Unknown 84 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2013.
All research outputs
#2,161,740
of 17,363,630 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,880
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,395
of 170,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,363,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.