↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Perioperative nutrition interventions for women with ovarian cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
Title
Perioperative nutrition interventions for women with ovarian cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009884.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hazel A Billson, Cathrine Holland, Janet Curwell, Valerie L Davey, Laura Kinsey, Lianna J Lawton, Alison J Whitworth, Sorrel Burden

Abstract

Women with ovarian cancer have been shown to be at significant risk of malnutrition with incidence rates described as being between 28% to 67%. Nutrition interventions may improve clinical outcomes positively, nutritional status or quality of life measures in this patient group.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Rwanda 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 226 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 22%
Researcher 26 11%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 7%
Other 12 5%
Other 34 15%
Unknown 67 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 13%
Social Sciences 11 5%
Psychology 10 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 75 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2020.
All research outputs
#5,779,208
of 20,621,417 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,895
of 12,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,024
of 178,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#65
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,621,417 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,092 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.