↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Perioperative nutrition interventions for women with ovarian cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
Title
Perioperative nutrition interventions for women with ovarian cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009884.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hazel A Billson, Cathrine Holland, Janet Curwell, Valerie L Davey, Laura Kinsey, Lianna J Lawton, Alison J Whitworth, Sorrel Burden

Abstract

Women with ovarian cancer have been shown to be at significant risk of malnutrition with incidence rates described as being between 28% to 67%. Nutrition interventions may improve clinical outcomes positively, nutritional status or quality of life measures in this patient group.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Rwanda 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 176 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 24%
Researcher 22 12%
Student > Bachelor 21 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 8%
Student > Postgraduate 12 7%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 39 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 14%
Social Sciences 10 6%
Psychology 8 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 44 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2020.
All research outputs
#4,584,299
of 17,349,416 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,968
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,454
of 170,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#62
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,349,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.9. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.