| Title |
Perioperative nutrition interventions for women with ovarian cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009884.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hazel A Billson, Cathrine Holland, Janet Curwell, Valerie L Davey, Laura Kinsey, Lianna J Lawton, Alison J Whitworth, Sorrel Burden |
| Abstract |
Women with ovarian cancer have been shown to be at significant risk of malnutrition with incidence rates described as being between 28% to 67%. Nutrition interventions may improve clinical outcomes positively, nutritional status or quality of life measures in this patient group. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Rwanda | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 257 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 51 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 11% |
| Researcher | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 41 | 16% |
| Unknown | 84 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 83 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 4% |
| Psychology | 10 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 9% |
| Unknown | 92 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2020.
All research outputs
#6,395,364
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,212
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,495
of 198,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#154
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.