↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Active chest compression‐decompression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
Title
Active chest compression‐decompression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002751.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carmelo Lafuente‐Lafuente, María Melero‐Bascones

Abstract

Active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ACDR CPR) uses a hand-held suction device, applied mid-sternum, to compress the chest then actively decompress the chest after each compression. Randomised controlled trials testing this device have shown discordant results.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 195 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 14%
Researcher 24 12%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Other 13 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 6%
Other 48 24%
Unknown 54 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 11%
Psychology 4 2%
Unspecified 4 2%
Computer Science 3 1%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 60 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2018.
All research outputs
#6,783,328
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,921
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,341
of 213,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#154
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.