↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Different corticosteroids and regimens for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
215 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
425 Mendeley
Title
Different corticosteroids and regimens for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006764.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona C Brownfoot, Daniela I Gagliardi, Emily Bain, Philippa Middleton, Caroline A Crowther

Abstract

Despite the widespread use of antenatal corticosteroids to prevent respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants, there is currently no consensus as to the type of corticosteroid to use; nor the dose, frequency, timing of use or the route of administration.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 425 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 412 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 66 16%
Student > Bachelor 63 15%
Student > Postgraduate 43 10%
Researcher 35 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 8%
Other 81 19%
Unknown 105 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 205 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 3%
Neuroscience 8 2%
Other 45 11%
Unknown 114 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,077,416
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,164
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,327
of 212,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#161
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.