↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Improving adverse drug event reporting by health care professionals

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Improving adverse drug event reporting by health care professionals
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012594
Authors

Gloria Shalviri, Niayesh Mohebbi, Fariba Mirbaha, Reza Majdzadeh, Bahareh Yazdizadeh, Kheirollah Gholami

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 15%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 7 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2017.
All research outputs
#6,113,953
of 12,100,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,111
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,450
of 265,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#136
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,100,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.