↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Combined oestrogen and progesterone for preventing miscarriage

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
Title
Combined oestrogen and progesterone for preventing miscarriage
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009278.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chi Eung Danforn Lim, Karen KW Ho, Nga Chong Lisa Cheng, Felix WS Wong

Abstract

Historically, oestrogen and progesterone were each commonly used to save threatened pregnancies. In the 1940s it was postulated that their combined use would be synergistic and thereby led to the rationale of combined therapy for women who risked miscarriage.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Unknown 144 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 16%
Researcher 19 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Other 7 5%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 27 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 11%
Psychology 6 4%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 32 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2018.
All research outputs
#2,458,752
of 13,526,754 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,306
of 10,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,187
of 164,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#49
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,526,754 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.