↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Long-term non-pharmacological weight loss interventions for adults with prediabetes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
234 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
298 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Long-term non-pharmacological weight loss interventions for adults with prediabetes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005270
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan L Norris, Xuanping Zhang, Alison Avenell, Edward Gregg, Christopher H Schmid, Joseph Lau

Abstract

Most persons with prediabetes (impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting glucose) are overweight, and obesity worsens the metabolic and physiologic abnormalities associated with this condition. Prediabetes is an important risk factor for the development of type 2 diabetes.

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 294 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 12%
Student > Bachelor 35 12%
Researcher 34 11%
Other 17 6%
Other 57 19%
Unknown 65 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 103 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 11%
Psychology 16 5%
Social Sciences 14 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Other 35 12%
Unknown 86 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,545,110
of 23,924,386 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,519
of 12,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,164
of 59,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,924,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.