↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Remote and web 2.0 interventions for promoting physical activity

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
50 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
251 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Remote and web 2.0 interventions for promoting physical activity
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010395.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Foster C, Richards J, Thorogood M, Hillsdon M, Charles Foster, Justin Richards, Margaret Thorogood, Melvyn Hillsdon, Foster, Charles, Richards, Justin, Thorogood, Margaret, Hillsdon, Melvyn

Abstract

Remote and web 2.0 interventions for promoting physical activity (PA) are becoming increasingly popular but their ability to achieve long term changes are unknown.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 243 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 19%
Student > Master 42 17%
Researcher 41 16%
Student > Bachelor 18 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Other 42 17%
Unknown 44 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 13%
Psychology 30 12%
Social Sciences 26 10%
Sports and Recreations 9 4%
Other 32 13%
Unknown 55 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2017.
All research outputs
#609,343
of 16,441,477 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,576
of 11,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,219
of 172,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,441,477 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.