↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Remote and web 2.0 interventions for promoting physical activity

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
49 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
322 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Remote and web 2.0 interventions for promoting physical activity
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010395.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Foster, Charles, Richards, Justin, Thorogood, Margaret, Hillsdon, Melvyn

Abstract

Remote and web 2.0 interventions for promoting physical activity (PA) are becoming increasingly popular but their ability to achieve long term changes are unknown.

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 322 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 314 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 17%
Student > Master 48 15%
Researcher 44 14%
Student > Bachelor 26 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 5%
Other 51 16%
Unknown 83 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 11%
Psychology 36 11%
Social Sciences 25 8%
Sports and Recreations 11 3%
Other 36 11%
Unknown 99 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2017.
All research outputs
#852,275
of 23,957,285 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,758
of 12,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,756
of 209,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,957,285 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,817 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.