↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Paracervical local anaesthesia for cervical dilatation and uterine intervention

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
Title
Paracervical local anaesthesia for cervical dilatation and uterine intervention
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005056.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thumwadee Tangsiriwatthana, Ussanee S Sangkomkamhang, Pisake Lumbiganon, Malinee Laopaiboon

Abstract

Cervical dilatation and uterine intervention can be performed under sedation, local or general anaesthesia for obstetrics and gynaecological conditions. Many gynaecologists use paracervical local anaesthesia but its effectiveness is unclear. This review was originally published in 2009 and was updated in 2013.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 193 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 16%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Researcher 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Student > Postgraduate 13 7%
Other 43 22%
Unknown 56 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 90 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 10%
Psychology 5 3%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 62 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,771,823
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,402
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,501
of 218,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#110
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 218,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.