↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Paracervical local anaesthesia for cervical dilatation and uterine intervention

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
Title
Paracervical local anaesthesia for cervical dilatation and uterine intervention
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005056.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thumwadee Tangsiriwatthana, Ussanee S Sangkomkamhang, Pisake Lumbiganon, Malinee Laopaiboon

Abstract

Cervical dilatation and uterine intervention can be performed under sedation, local or general anaesthesia for obstetrics and gynaecological conditions. Many gynaecologists use paracervical local anaesthesia but its effectiveness is unclear. This review was originally published in 2009 and was updated in 2013.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 147 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 18%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Researcher 13 9%
Student > Postgraduate 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 9%
Other 34 23%
Unknown 33 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Psychology 4 3%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Engineering 2 1%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 37 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2021.
All research outputs
#11,577,488
of 19,012,843 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,906
of 11,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,002
of 181,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#83
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,012,843 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,917 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.