↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Analgesia for forceps delivery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Analgesia for forceps delivery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008878.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Payam Nikpoor, Emily Bain

Abstract

A forceps delivery may be indicated when a fetus fails to progress to delivery, or when delivery needs to be expedited in the second stage of labour. Effective analgesia is required to ensure that the woman is comfortable throughout the delivery, to allow the obstetrician to safely perform the procedure. It is currently unclear what the most effective and safe agent or method is to provide pain relief during forceps delivery.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 79 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Student > Master 5 6%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 29 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Unspecified 4 5%
Psychology 4 5%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 31 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2013.
All research outputs
#12,766,256
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,771
of 12,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,812
of 205,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#167
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.