↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Analgesia for forceps delivery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
Analgesia for forceps delivery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008878.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Payam Nikpoor, Emily Bain

Abstract

A forceps delivery may be indicated when a fetus fails to progress to delivery, or when delivery needs to be expedited in the second stage of labour. Effective analgesia is required to ensure that the woman is comfortable throughout the delivery, to allow the obstetrician to safely perform the procedure. It is currently unclear what the most effective and safe agent or method is to provide pain relief during forceps delivery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 103 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 5 5%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 49 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Psychology 4 4%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 52 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2013.
All research outputs
#15,204,497
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,900
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,125
of 219,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#191
of 227 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 227 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.