↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for chronic palmoplantar pustulosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for chronic palmoplantar pustulosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001433.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Chalmers, Sally Hollis, Jo Leonardi-Bee, Christopher EM Griffiths, Alexander Marsland Bsc MRCP

Abstract

Chronic palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition characterised by crops of sterile pustules (yellow pus spots) on the palms and soles which erupt repeatedly over months or years. The affected areas tend to become red and scaly; cracks may form and these are often painful. Many different treatments have been used for palmoplantar pustulosis but none is generally accepted as being reliably effective.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 87 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 18%
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Postgraduate 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 17 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Psychology 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 20 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2018.
All research outputs
#3,144,643
of 16,454,279 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,852
of 11,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,451
of 173,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#52
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,454,279 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.