| Title |
Retention versus sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty for treating osteoarthritis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004803.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wiebe C Verra, Lennard GH van den Boom, Wilco Jacobs, Darren J Clement, Ate AB Wymenga, Rob GHH Nelissen |
| Abstract |
The functional and clinical basis on which to choose whether or not to retain the posterior cruciate ligament during total knee arthroplasty surgery remained unclear after a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis in 2005, which contained eight clinical trials. Several new trials have been conducted since then. Hence, an update of the review was performed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 339 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 336 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 59 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 11% |
| Researcher | 31 | 9% |
| Other | 26 | 8% |
| Other | 59 | 17% |
| Unknown | 88 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 129 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 9% |
| Engineering | 11 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 10 | 3% |
| Psychology | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 41 | 12% |
| Unknown | 108 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2023.
All research outputs
#4,387,830
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,619
of 12,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,963
of 210,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#123
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.