↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Nebulized epinephrine for croup in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
4 blogs
twitter
48 tweeters
facebook
10 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
Title
Nebulized epinephrine for croup in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006619.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Candice Bjornson, Kelly Russell, Ben Vandermeer, Terry P Klassen, David W Johnson

Abstract

Croup is a common childhood illness characterized by barky cough, stridor, hoarseness and respiratory distress. Children with severe croup are at risk for intubation. Nebulized epinephrine may prevent intubation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 113 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 23%
Student > Master 24 21%
Researcher 6 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 5%
Student > Postgraduate 5 4%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 28 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 13%
Psychology 11 10%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 32 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2019.
All research outputs
#462,490
of 17,600,468 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,049
of 11,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,074
of 178,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,600,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,720 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.