↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) interventions: effects on child development in low- and middle-income countries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
233 Mendeley
Title
Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) interventions: effects on child development in low- and middle-income countries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012613
Authors

Joe D Piper, Jaya Chandna, Elizabeth Allen, Kenneth Linkman, Oliver Cumming, Andrew J. Prendergast, Melissa J Gladstone

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 233 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 20%
Researcher 25 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 9%
Student > Bachelor 21 9%
Other 14 6%
Other 37 16%
Unknown 68 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 13%
Social Sciences 16 7%
Environmental Science 11 5%
Engineering 10 4%
Other 42 18%
Unknown 76 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2021.
All research outputs
#776,579
of 21,427,634 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,727
of 12,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,019
of 282,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#45
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,427,634 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.