↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervix cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
Title
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervix cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001774.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jayne Tierney, Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta‐analysis Collaboration Collaboration, Larysa Rydzewska

Abstract

Despite the enrollment of more than 3000 women in randomised trials, the benefits and risks of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer remained uncertain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 120 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 14 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 11%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Master 10 8%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 43 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 45 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2013.
All research outputs
#20,824,878
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12,261
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,596
of 62,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.