| Title |
Chlorhexidine mouthrinse as an adjunctive treatment for gingival health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008676.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patrice James, Helen V Worthington, Carmel Parnell, Mairead Harding, Thomas Lamont, Andrea Cheung, Helen Whelton, Philip Riley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 159 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 9% |
| Saudi Arabia | 14 | 9% |
| Spain | 11 | 7% |
| United States | 7 | 4% |
| Canada | 5 | 3% |
| Australia | 4 | 3% |
| Chile | 3 | 2% |
| Ireland | 3 | 2% |
| Peru | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 28 | 18% |
| Unknown | 67 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 92 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 43 | 27% |
| Scientists | 21 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 962 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 962 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 134 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 116 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 66 | 7% |
| Researcher | 54 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 52 | 5% |
| Other | 157 | 16% |
| Unknown | 383 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 366 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 43 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 15 | 2% |
| Other | 94 | 10% |
| Unknown | 406 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 130. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2023.
All research outputs
#324,574
of 25,722,279 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#542
of 13,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,754
of 324,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,722,279 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.