↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Lifestyle modification for obstructive sleep apnoea

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
Title
Lifestyle modification for obstructive sleep apnoea
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2001
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002875
Pubmed ID
Authors

John Shneerson, John J Wright

Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnoeas are due to transient closure of the upper airway during sleep and merge into hypopnoeas in which the airway narrows, but some airflow continues. They are due to the forces compressing the airway overcoming those which stabilise its patency. The commonest association is obesity in which fatty tissue is deposited around the airway. Exercise has been recommended as a method of losing weight, but other techniques which achieve this are also thought to improve symptoms due to sleep apnoeas. Sleep hygiene may alter the sleep structure and the control of the upper airway during sleep and thus promote its patency.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 180 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 19%
Student > Bachelor 30 16%
Researcher 17 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 7%
Student > Postgraduate 12 6%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 48 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 12%
Psychology 7 4%
Computer Science 5 3%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 52 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2016.
All research outputs
#7,882,434
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,218
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,064
of 114,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.