↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Vocational rehabilitation for enhancing return-to-work in workers with traumatic upper limb injuries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Vocational rehabilitation for enhancing return-to-work in workers with traumatic upper limb injuries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010002.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wen-Hsuan Hou, Ching-Chi Chi, Heng-Lien Daniel Lo, Ken N Kuo, Hung-Yi Chuang

Abstract

Traumatic upper limb injury is a leading cause of work-related disability. After return-to-work (RTW), many survivors of injuries are able to regain a quality of life (QoL) comparable with the normal population. Since RTW plays an important role in economic productivity and regaining health-related QoL, enhancing RTW in workers with traumatic limb injuries is the primary goal of rehabilitation. Vocational rehabilitation has been adapted in the field of occupational safety and health to enhance the number of injured people returning to the labour market, prevent illness, increase well-being, and reduce disability.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 1%
Ghana 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 74 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 23%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 10%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 9 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 18%
Psychology 7 9%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Arts and Humanities 3 4%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 8 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2018.
All research outputs
#5,666,589
of 17,520,772 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,147
of 11,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,199
of 194,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#66
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,520,772 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,709 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.