| Title |
Occlusal splints for treating sleep bruxism (tooth grinding)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005514.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cristiane R Macedo, Ademir B Silva, Marco Antonio C Machado, Humberto Saconato, Gilmar F Prado |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 28% |
| Finland | 3 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Chile | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 462 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 453 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 87 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 52 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 48 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 7% |
| Researcher | 31 | 7% |
| Other | 100 | 22% |
| Unknown | 111 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 252 | 55% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 12 | 3% |
| Psychology | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 38 | 8% |
| Unknown | 115 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 96. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2022.
All research outputs
#390,767
of 23,566,295 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#715
of 12,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#563
of 76,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,566,295 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.