↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

'Third wave' cognitive and behavioural therapies versus other psychological therapies for depression

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
497 Mendeley
Title
'Third wave' cognitive and behavioural therapies versus other psychological therapies for depression
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008704.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vivien Hunot, Theresa HM Moore, Deborah M Caldwell, Toshi A Furukawa, Philippa Davies, Hannah Jones, Mina Honyashiki, Peiyao Chen, Glyn Lewis, Rachel Churchill

Abstract

So-called 'third wave' cognitive and behavioural therapies represents a new generation of psychological therapies that are increasingly being used in the treatment of psychological problems. However, the effectiveness and acceptability of third wave cognitive and behavioural therapy (CBT) approaches as a treatment for depression compared with other psychological therapies remain unclear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 497 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 1%
Japan 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 487 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 95 19%
Student > Bachelor 70 14%
Researcher 67 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 47 9%
Other 94 19%
Unknown 65 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 207 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 98 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 8%
Social Sciences 22 4%
Neuroscience 12 2%
Other 36 7%
Unknown 82 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2021.
All research outputs
#268,353
of 17,464,602 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#554
of 11,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,973
of 194,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,464,602 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,696 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.