↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Primary closure versus delayed closure for non bite traumatic wounds within 24 hours post injury

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
Title
Primary closure versus delayed closure for non bite traumatic wounds within 24 hours post injury
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008574.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martha C Eliya-Masamba, Grace W Banda

Abstract

Acute traumatic wounds are one of the common reasons why people present to the emergency department. Primary closure has traditionally been reserved for traumatic wounds presenting within six hours of injury and considered 'clean' by the attending surgeon, with the rest undergoing delayed primary closure as a means of controlling wound infection. Primary closure has the potential benefit of rapid wound healing but poses the potential threat of increased wound infection. There is currently no evidence to guide clinical decision-making on the best timing for closure of traumatic wounds.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 121 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Other 27 22%
Unknown 28 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 45%
Psychology 7 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Unspecified 5 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 34 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,279,237
of 23,575,346 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,892
of 12,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,727
of 213,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#95
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,575,346 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.