| Title |
Heliox for treatment of exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003571 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gustavo J. Rodrigo, Charles V Pollack, Carlos Rodrigo, Brian H Rowe, E. Haydn Walters |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 104 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 14% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 48 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | <1% |
| Computer Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 53 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2013.
All research outputs
#6,783,328
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,921
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,871
of 114,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.