The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Tracheal gas insufflation for the prevention of morbidity and mortality in mechanically ventilated newborn infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002973 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark W Davies, Paul G Woodgate |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 92 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 6% |
| Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 35 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
| Psychology | 5 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 37 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2013.
All research outputs
#18,195,351
of 26,616,237 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,716
of 13,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,860
of 129,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#33
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,616,237 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.