↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high‐risk pregnancies

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
Title
Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high‐risk pregnancies
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007529.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Gyte GM, Alfirevic, Zarko, Stampalija, Tamara, Gyte, Gillian ML

Abstract

Abnormal blood flow patterns in fetal circulation detected by Doppler ultrasound may indicate poor fetal prognosis. It is also possible false positive Doppler ultrasound findings could encourage inappropriate early delivery.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 92 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 15%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Other 11 12%
Student > Master 10 11%
Other 27 28%
Unknown 11 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 60%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Psychology 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 14 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2017.
All research outputs
#773,893
of 13,308,245 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,484
of 10,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,527
of 183,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#28
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,308,245 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.