| Title |
Nurse‐led versus doctor‐led preoperative assessment for elective surgical patients requiring regional or general anaesthesia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010160.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amanda Nicholson, Chris H Coldwell, Sharon R Lewis, Andrew F Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 285 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 278 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 14% |
| Researcher | 29 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 62 | 22% |
| Unknown | 88 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 85 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 50 | 18% |
| Psychology | 9 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 8% |
| Unknown | 102 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2020.
All research outputs
#4,367,915
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,838
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,706
of 225,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#149
of 250 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 250 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.