↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Clinical assessment to screen for the detection of oral cavity cancer and potentially malignant disorders in apparently healthy adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
58 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
295 Mendeley
Title
Clinical assessment to screen for the detection of oral cavity cancer and potentially malignant disorders in apparently healthy adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010173.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tanya Walsh, Joseph LY Liu, Paul Brocklehurst, Anne-Marie Glenny, Mark Lingen, Alexander R Kerr, Graham Ogden, Saman Warnakulasuriya, Crispian Scully

Abstract

The early detection and excision of potentially malignant disorders (PMD) of the lip and oral cavity that require intervention may reduce malignant transformations (though will not totally eliminate malignancy occurring), or if malignancy is detected during surveillance, there is some evidence that appropriate treatment may improve survival rates.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 295 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 286 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 57 19%
Student > Bachelor 37 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 11%
Researcher 28 9%
Student > Postgraduate 18 6%
Other 63 21%
Unknown 59 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 139 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 3%
Psychology 9 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Other 38 13%
Unknown 70 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2017.
All research outputs
#572,131
of 18,891,791 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,299
of 11,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,811
of 284,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,891,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.