↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Patient-reported outcome measures for follow-up after gynaecological cancer treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
7 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
Title
Patient-reported outcome measures for follow-up after gynaecological cancer treatment
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010299.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vivek Nama, Andy Nordin, Andrew Bryant

Abstract

Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide. Gynaecologic cancer treatment is known to have the potential for a major impact on quality of life (QoL). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is an umbrella term that covers a range of potential types of measurement but is used specifically to refer to self reports by the patient of their health and well-being. Use of QoL and cancer-specific questionnaires as alternatives to follow-up may have immense psychological benefit to the patient and cost benefit to the healthcare system.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 131 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 38 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 17%
Psychology 11 8%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 40 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,492,996
of 21,332,163 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,518
of 12,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,912
of 304,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,332,163 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.