↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Relapse prevention interventions for smoking cessation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
152 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
277 Mendeley
Title
Relapse prevention interventions for smoking cessation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003999.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Hajek, Lindsay F Stead, Robert West, Martin Jarvis, Jamie Hartmann‐Boyce, Tim Lancaster

Abstract

A number of treatments can help smokers make a successful quit attempt, but many initially successful quitters relapse over time. Several interventions have been proposed to help prevent relapse.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 270 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 46 17%
Student > Master 39 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 13%
Student > Bachelor 24 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 7%
Other 56 20%
Unknown 58 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 29%
Psychology 36 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 10%
Social Sciences 21 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Other 30 11%
Unknown 74 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,647,099
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,521
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,010
of 210,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#79
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.