↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Smartphone and tablet self management apps for asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
52 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
197 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
687 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Smartphone and tablet self management apps for asthma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010013.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

José S Marcano Belisario, Kit Huckvale, Geva Greenfield, Josip Car, Laura H Gunn

Abstract

Asthma is one of the most common long-term conditions worldwide, which places considerable pressure on patients, communities and health systems. The major international clinical guidelines now recommend the inclusion of self management programmes in the routine management of patients with asthma. These programmes have been associated with improved outcomes in patients with asthma. However, the implementation of self management programmes in clinical practice, and their uptake by patients, is still poor. Recent developments in mobile technology, such as smartphone and tablet computer apps, could help develop a platform for the delivery of self management interventions that are highly customisable, low-cost and easily accessible.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 687 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 8 1%
United States 7 1%
Spain 4 <1%
Portugal 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 654 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 137 20%
Researcher 94 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 91 13%
Student > Bachelor 74 11%
Other 50 7%
Other 153 22%
Unknown 88 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 227 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 106 15%
Computer Science 52 8%
Social Sciences 45 7%
Psychology 37 5%
Other 99 14%
Unknown 121 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2018.
All research outputs
#516,860
of 16,413,306 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,280
of 11,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,947
of 266,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,413,306 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.