| Title |
Serum amylase and lipase and urinary trypsinogen and amylase for diagnosis of acute pancreatitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012010.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gianluca Rompianesi, Angus Hann, Oluyemi Komolafe, Stephen P Pereira, Brian R Davidson, Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 3 | 25% |
| United States | 2 | 17% |
| Spain | 2 | 17% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 361 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 361 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 52 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 43 | 12% |
| Researcher | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 63 | 17% |
| Unknown | 137 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 121 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 35 | 10% |
| Unknown | 139 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2021.
All research outputs
#5,517,069
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,743
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,341
of 327,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#159
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.